netdev - [PATCH net v1] vsock/test: fix SEQPACKET message bounds test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:16:42 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Stefano Garzarella
	<sgarzare@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang
	<jasowang@...hat.com>, Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@...il.com>, <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v1] vsock/test: fix SEQPACKET message bounds test

Tune message length calculation to make this test work on machines
where 'getpagesize()' returns >32KB. Now maximum message length is not
hardcoded (on machines above it was smaller than 'getpagesize()' return
value, thus we get negative value and test fails), but calculated at
runtime and always bigger than 'getpagesize()' result. Reproduced on
aarch64 with 64KB page size.

Fixes: 5c338112e48a ("test/vsock: rework message bounds test")
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index f5623b8d76b7..691e44c746bf 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -353,11 +353,12 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 }
 
 #define SOCK_BUF_SIZE (2 * 1024 * 1024)
-#define MAX_MSG_SIZE (32 * 1024)
+#define MAX_MSG_PAGES 4
 
 static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 {
 	unsigned long curr_hash;
+	size_t max_msg_size;
 	int page_size;
 	int msg_count;
 	int fd;
@@ -373,7 +374,8 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 
 	curr_hash = 0;
 	page_size = getpagesize();
-	msg_count = SOCK_BUF_SIZE / MAX_MSG_SIZE;
+	max_msg_size = MAX_MSG_PAGES * page_size;
+	msg_count = SOCK_BUF_SIZE / max_msg_size;
 
 	for (int i = 0; i < msg_count; i++) {
 		size_t buf_size;
@@ -383,7 +385,7 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
 		/* Use "small" buffers and "big" buffers. */
 		if (i & 1)
 			buf_size = page_size +
-					(rand() % (MAX_MSG_SIZE - page_size));
+					(rand() % (max_msg_size - page_size));
 		else
 			buf_size = 1 + (rand() % page_size);
 
@@ -429,7 +431,6 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	unsigned long remote_hash;
 	unsigned long curr_hash;
 	int fd;
-	char buf[MAX_MSG_SIZE];
 	struct msghdr msg = {0};
 	struct iovec iov = {0};
 
@@ -457,8 +458,13 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	control_writeln("SRVREADY");
 	/* Wait, until peer sends whole data. */
 	control_expectln("SENDDONE");
-	iov.iov_base = buf;
-	iov.iov_len = sizeof(buf);
+	iov.iov_len = MAX_MSG_PAGES * getpagesize();
+	iov.iov_base = malloc(iov.iov_len);
+	if (!iov.iov_base) {
+		perror("malloc");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
 	msg.msg_iov = &iov;
 	msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
 
@@ -483,6 +489,7 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
 		curr_hash += hash_djb2(msg.msg_iov[0].iov_base, recv_size);
 	}
 
+	free(iov.iov_base);
 	close(fd);
 	remote_hash = control_readulong();
 
-- 
2.25.1