netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3 3/5] i40e: Add helpers to find VSI and VEB by SEID and use them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48330ace-2b5f-4919-b5cb-7ac4372120bf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:58:53 +0100
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
 Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, Simon Horman
 <horms@...nel.org>, mschmidt@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3 3/5] i40e: Add helpers to find VSI and VEB by
 SEID and use them

On 22. 11. 23 0:05, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/16/2023 7:21 AM, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> 
>> @@ -13197,17 +13193,14 @@ static int i40e_ndo_bridge_getlink(struct 
>> sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
>>       struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi;
>>       struct i40e_pf *pf = vsi->back;
>>       struct i40e_veb *veb = NULL;
>> -    int i;
>>       /* Only for PF VSI for now */
>>       if (vsi->seid != pf->vsi[pf->lan_vsi]->seid)
>>           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>       /* Find the HW bridge for the PF VSI */
>> -    i40e_pf_for_each_veb(pf, i, veb)
>> -        if (veb->seid == vsi->uplink_seid)
>> -            break;
>> -    if (i == I40E_MAX_VEB)
>> +    veb = i40e_pf_get_veb_by_seid(pf, vsi->uplink_seid);
>> +    if (!vsi)
>>           return 0;
> 
> In addition to the kdoc stuff that Simon pointed out. Should this null 
> check be against veb?
> 
Oops, the check should be against veb here not aganst vsi...
Good eyes, Tony. Thanks, I will fix this.

Ivan