[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231121152906.2dd5f487@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:29:06 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
corbet@....net, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
vladimir.oltean@....com, andrew@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
mkubecek@...e.cz, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gal@...dia.com,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Igor Bagnucki
<igor.bagnucki@...el.com>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] net: ethtool: pass ethtool_rxfh to
get/set_rxfh ethtool ops
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:56:08 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> u32 (*get_rxfh_key_size)(struct net_device *);
> u32 (*get_rxfh_indir_size)(struct net_device *);
> - int (*get_rxfh)(struct net_device *, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> - u8 *hfunc);
> - int (*set_rxfh)(struct net_device *, const u32 *indir,
> - const u8 *key, const u8 hfunc);
> + int (*get_rxfh)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_rxfh *,
> + u32 *indir, u8 *key);
> + int (*set_rxfh)(struct net_device *, struct ethtool_rxfh *,
> + const u32 *indir, const u8 *key);
> int (*get_rxfh_context)(struct net_device *, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> u8 *hfunc, u32 rss_context);
> int (*set_rxfh_context)(struct net_device *, const u32 *indir,
This conversion looks 1/4th done. You should do the following:
- First simplify the code by always providing a pointer to all params
(indir, key and func); the fact that some of them may be NULL seems
like a weird historic thing or a premature optimization.
It will simplify the drivers if all pointers are always present.
You don't have to remove the if () checks in the existing drivers.
- Then make the functions take a dev pointer, and a pointer to a
single struct wrapping all arguments. The set_* should also take
an extack.
- Add a rss_context member to the argument struct and a capability
like cap_link_lanes_supported to indicate whether driver supports
rss contexts, then you can remove *et_rxfh_context functions,
and instead call *et_rxfh() with a non-zero rss_context.
- Add your new member to the struct wrapping all params.
If you just expose struct ethtool_rxfh to the drivers (a) there are
fields in there drivers shouldn't touch, and (b) that struct is uAPI
so we can't add netlink-only fields easily.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists