netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] ipv6: Correct/silence an endian warning in ip6_multipath_l3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40a08bfe-6470-4fe0-8540-81db17c2bbc4@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:51:24 -0800
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>,
 Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, jkbs@...hat.com, kunwu.chan@...mail.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ipv6: Correct/silence an endian warning in
 ip6_multipath_l3_keys

On 11/22/23 1:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 05:04:49PM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I also can't guarantee that it's the right thing to do. Just wanted to
>> dispel this warning. If you have any better way, please let me know.
> 
> The most likely reason is that it needs an endianess conversion.  I
> don't know the answer either, but actually spending a few minutes
> trying to understand the code should allow you to find it out quickly.
> 
> Removing a warning for it's own sake when you don't understand it is
> never a good idea.
> 

We should be able to set flow_label to __be32 in flow_dissector_key_tags
(and remove a couple ntohl).

Tom: any reason not to do that?