[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fc84e79-f5c9-8fbe-1fe8-b23b059f03d0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:04:06 +0800
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, <andy@...yhouse.net>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v5] bonding: return -ENOMEM instead of BUG in
alb_upper_dev_walk
On 2023/11/21 20:58, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
> If failed to allocate "tags" or could not find the final upper device from
> start_dev's upper list in bond_verify_device_path(), only the loopback
> detection of the current upper device should be affected, and the system is
> no need to be panic.
> So just return -ENOMEM in alb_upper_dev_walk to stop walking.
>
> I also think that the following function calls
> netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu
> ---->>>alb_upper_dev_walk
> ---------->>>bond_verify_device_path
>>>From this way, "end device" can eventually be obtained from "start device"
> in bond_verify_device_path, IS_ERR(tags) could be instead of
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags) in alb_upper_dev_walk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
> ---
> v5: drop print information, if the memory allocation fails, the mm layer
> will emit a lot warning comprising the backtrace
> v4: print information instead of warn
> v3: return -ENOMEM instead of zero to stop walk
> v2: use WARN_ON_ONCE instead of WARN_ON
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> index dc2c7b979656..7edf0fd58c34 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> @@ -985,7 +985,8 @@ static int alb_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper,
> if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
> tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
> - BUG();
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
> tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
> kfree(tags);
Hi Paolo:
I find that v4 has been merged into net-next. So v5 is not
needed. But should I send another patch to drop that print info?
Thanks
Zhengchao Shao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists