[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00f801da1dee$fe4975a0$fadc60e0$@trustnetic.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:25:26 +0800
From: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
To: "'Andrew Lunn'" <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<horms@...nel.org>,
<mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: wangxun: add ethtool_ops for ring parameters
> > + new_tx_count = clamp_t(u32, ring->tx_pending, WX_MIN_TXD, WX_MAX_TXD);
> > + new_tx_count = ALIGN(new_tx_count, WX_REQ_TX_DESCRIPTOR_MULTIPLE);
> > +
> > + new_rx_count = clamp_t(u32, ring->rx_pending, WX_MIN_RXD, WX_MAX_RXD);
> > + new_rx_count = ALIGN(new_rx_count, WX_REQ_RX_DESCRIPTOR_MULTIPLE);
> > +
> > + if (new_tx_count == wx->tx_ring_count &&
> > + new_rx_count == wx->rx_ring_count)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!netif_running(wx->netdev)) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < wx->num_tx_queues; i++)
> > + wx->tx_ring[i]->count = new_tx_count;
> > + for (i = 0; i < wx->num_rx_queues; i++)
> > + wx->rx_ring[i]->count = new_rx_count;
> > + wx->tx_ring_count = new_tx_count;
> > + wx->rx_ring_count = new_rx_count;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + txgbe_down(wx);
> > +
> > + err = wx_set_ring(wx, new_tx_count, new_rx_count);
> > +
> > + txgbe_up(wx);
> > +
> > + return err;
>
> Could most of this be moved into the library? It looks pretty similar
> for the two devices.
I tried to move them into the library, but *_down() and *_up() here
involves some different flows for the two devices, it's not easy to handle.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists