lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:59:18 +0530
From: swarup <swarupkotikalapudi@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] netlink: specs: devlink: add some(not all)
 missing attributes in devlink.yaml

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:12:15AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:01:19AM CET, swarupkotikalapudi@...il.com wrote:
> >Add some missing(not all) attributes in devlink.yaml.
> >
> >Re-generate the related devlink-user.[ch] code.
> >
> >enum have been given name as devlink_stats(for trap stats)
> >and devlink_trap_metadata_type(for trap metadata type)
> >
> >Test result with trap-get command:
> >  $ sudo ./tools/net/ynl/cli.py \
> >   --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/devlink.yaml \
> >   --do trap-get --json '{"bus-name": "netdevsim", \
> >                          "dev-name": "netdevsim1", \
> >   "trap-name": "ttl_value_is_too_small"}' --process-unknown
> > {'attr-stats': {'rx-bytes': 47918326, 'rx-dropped': 21,
> >                'rx-packets': 337453},
> > 'bus-name': 'netdevsim',
> > 'dev-name': 'netdevsim1',
> > 'trap-action': 'trap',
> > 'trap-generic': True,
> > 'trap-group-name': 'l3_exceptions',
> > 'trap-metadata': {'metadata-type-in-port': True},
> > 'trap-name': 'ttl_value_is_too_small',
> > 'trap-type': 'exception'}
> 
> 1. You have to maintain 24 hours between submission of one
> patch/patchset:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.6/process/maintainer-netdev.html
> 2. You didn't address my comment to last version
> 
Hi Jiri,

I have read the above link, but missed the constraint
of 24 hour gap between patches.
I will be careful and not send the patch again within 24 hours.

I could not understand your 2nd point.
Does it mean i should not include
test result e.g. "Test result with trap-get command: ...."
Or
If it is something else, please elabroate more, which helps me to address your comment.

I will try to clarify review comment, henceforth before sending new patchset for review.

Thanks,
Swarup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ