lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL0PR11MB3521837E8A9C3309CA8CAEC18FB9A@BL0PR11MB3521.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 19:21:49 +0000
From: "Romanowski, Rafal" <rafal.romanowski@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Michal Swiatkowski
	<michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Cao, Yahui"
	<yahui.cao@...el.com>, "marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com"
	<marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ice: change
 vfs.num_msix_per to vf->num_msix

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of
> Simon Horman
> Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 5:57 PM
> To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Cao, Yahui <yahui.cao@...el.com>;
> marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; Kitszel,
> Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; Keller, Jacob E
> <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ice: change
> vfs.num_msix_per to vf->num_msix
> 
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:20:10PM +0200, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > vfs::num_msix_per should be only used as default value for
> > vf->num_msix. For other use cases vf->num_msix should be used, as VF
> > vf->can
> > have different MSI-X amount values.
> >
> > Fix incorrect register index calculation. vfs::num_msix_per and
> > pf->sriov_base_vector shouldn't be used after implementation of
> > pf->changing
> > MSI-X amount on VFs. Instead vf->first_vector_idx should be used, as
> > it is storing value for first irq index.
> >
> > Fixes: fe1c5ca2fe76 ("ice: implement num_msix field per VF")
> > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan@...osl.org
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan


Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@...el.com>



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ