netdev - [PATCHv2 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix marvell 6350 probe crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231124041529.3450079-2-gerg@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 14:15:29 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>
To: rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
	andrew@...n.ch,
	hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix marvell 6350 probe crash

As of commit b92143d4420f ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add infrastructure for
phylink_pcs") probing of a Marvell 88e6350 switch causes a NULL pointer
de-reference like this example:

    ...
    mv88e6085 d0072004.mdio-mii:11: switch 0x3710 detected: Marvell 88E6350, revision 2
    8<--- cut here ---
    Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 when read
    [00000000] *pgd=00000000
    Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] ARM
    Modules linked in:
    CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-dirty #26
    Hardware name: Marvell Armada 370/XP (Device Tree)
    Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
    PC is at mv88e6xxx_port_setup+0x1c/0x44
    LR is at dsa_port_devlink_setup+0x74/0x154
    pc : [<c057ea24>]    lr : [<c0819598>]    psr: a0000013
    sp : c184fce0  ip : c542b8f4  fp : 00000000
    r10: 00000001  r9 : c542a540  r8 : c542bc00
    r7 : c542b838  r6 : c5244580  r5 : 00000005  r4 : c5244580
    r3 : 00000000  r2 : c542b840  r1 : 00000005  r0 : c1a02040
    ...

The Marvell 6350 switch has no SERDES interface and so has no
corresponding pcs_ops defined for it. But during probing a call is made
to mv88e6xxx_port_setup() which unconditionally expects pcs_ops to exist -
though the presence of the pcs_ops->pcs_init function is optional.

Modify code to check for pcs_ops first, before checking for and calling
pcs_ops->pcs_init. Modify checking and use of pcs_ops->pcs_teardown
which may potentially suffer the same problem.

Fixes: b92143d4420f ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add infrastructure for phylink_pcs")
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

v2: apply same change to use of pcs_ops->teardown

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index d8a67bf4e595..07a22c74fe81 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -3892,7 +3892,8 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
 	struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
 	int err;
 
-	if (chip->info->ops->pcs_ops->pcs_init) {
+	if (chip->info->ops->pcs_ops &&
+	    chip->info->ops->pcs_ops->pcs_init) {
 		err = chip->info->ops->pcs_ops->pcs_init(chip, port);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
@@ -3907,7 +3908,8 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_port_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
 
 	mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_regions_port(ds, port);
 
-	if (chip->info->ops->pcs_ops->pcs_teardown)
+	if (chip->info->ops->pcs_ops &&
+	    chip->info->ops->pcs_ops->pcs_teardown)
 		chip->info->ops->pcs_ops->pcs_teardown(chip, port);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1