lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 05:27:28 +0000
From: Neil Spring <ntspring@...a.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Neal
 Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski
	<kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix mid stream window clamp.

> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 10:16 AM
> To: Eric Dumazet; Neal Cardwell; Wei Wang
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; David S. Miller; David Ahern; Jakub Kicinski; Neil Spring; David Gibson
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix mid stream window clamp.
> 
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>   This Message Is From an External Sender
> 
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
> 
> On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 18:10 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > CC Neal and Wei
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:25 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > After the blamed commit below, if the user-space application performs
> > > window clamping when tp->rcv_wnd is 0, the TCP socket will never be
> > > able to announce a non 0 receive window, even after completely emptying
> > > the receive buffer and re-setting the window clamp to higher values.
> > >
> > > Refactor tcp_set_window_clamp() to address the issue: when the user
> > > decreases the current clamp value, set rcv_ssthresh according to the
> > > same logic used at buffer initialization time.
> > > When increasing the clamp value, give the rcv_ssthresh a chance to grow
> > > according to previously implemented heuristic.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3aa7857fe1d7 ("tcp: enable mid stream window clamp")
> > > Reported-by: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
> > > Reported-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
> > > Tested-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  net/ipv4/tcp.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > > index 53bcc17c91e4..1a9b9064e080 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > > @@ -3368,9 +3368,22 @@ int tcp_set_window_clamp(struct sock *sk, int val)
> > >                         return -EINVAL;
> > >                 tp->window_clamp = 0;
> > >         } else {
> > > -               tp->window_clamp = val < SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF / 2 ?
> > > -                       SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF / 2 : val;
> > > -               tp->rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_wnd, tp->window_clamp);
> > > +               u32 new_rcv_ssthresh, old_window_clamp = tp->window_clamp;
> > > +               u32 new_window_clamp = val < SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF / 2 ?
> > > +                                               SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF / 2 : val;
> > > +
> > > +               if (new_window_clamp == old_window_clamp)
> > > +                       return 0;
> > > +
> > > +               tp->window_clamp = new_window_clamp;
> > > +               if (new_window_clamp < old_window_clamp) {
> > > +                       tp->rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_ssthresh,
> > > +                                              new_window_clamp);
> > > +               } else {
> > > +                       new_rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_wnd, tp->window_clamp);
> > > +                       tp->rcv_ssthresh = max(new_rcv_ssthresh,
> > > +                                              tp->rcv_ssthresh);
> > > +               }
> > >         }
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> >
> > It seems there is no provision for SO_RESERVE_MEM
> 
> Indeed I did take that in account.
> 
> > I wonder if tcp_adjust_rcv_ssthresh()  could help here ?
> 
> I don't know how to fit it into the above. tcp_adjust_rcv_ssthresh()
> tends to shrink rcv_ssthresh to low values when no memory is reserved.
> 
> Dealing directly with SO_RESERVE_MEM when shrinking the threshold feels
> easier to me, something alike:
> 
>                if (new_window_clamp == old_window_clamp)
>                        return 0;
> 
>                tp->window_clamp = new_window_clamp;
>                if (new_window_clamp < old_window_clamp) {
>                         int unused_mem = sk_unused_reserved_mem(sk);
> 
>                         tp->rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_ssthresh,
>                                                new_window_clamp);
> 
>                         if (unused_mem)
>                                 tp->rcv_ssthresh = max_t(u32, tp->rcv_ssthresh,
>                                         tcp_win_from_space(sk, unused_mem));
>                } else {
>                         new_rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_wnd, tp->window_clamp);
>                         tp->rcv_ssthresh = max(new_rcv_ssthresh,
>                                               tp->rcv_ssthresh);
>                }
> 
> Possibly the bits shared with tcp_adjust_rcv_ssthresh() could be
> factored out in a common helper.
> 
> > Have you considered reverting  3aa7857fe1d7 ("tcp: enable mid stream
> > window clamp") ?
> 
> 
> That would work, too and will be simpler.
> 
> The issue at hand was noted with an application that really wants to
> limit the announced window:
> 
> https://gitlab.com/dgibson/passt
> 
> I guess touching rcv_ssthresh would be a bit more effective.
> 
> Not much more in the end, as both window_clamp and rcv_ssthresh can
> later grow due to rcv buf auto-tune. Ideally we would like to prevent
> tcp_rcv_space_adjust() from touching window_clamp after
> TCP_WINDOW_CLAMP - but that is another matter/patch.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo
> 

The patch to fix the bug where rcv_sshthresh is reduced to zero on a full receive window and cannot recover is:
-tp->rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_wnd, tp->window_clamp);
+tp->rcv_ssthresh = min(tp->rcv_ssthresh, tp->window_clamp);

This change and the patch in this thread behave the same in the following packetdrill that reproduces the problem.   

-neil

---

`../common/defaults.sh`

   // Establish a connection.
    0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
   +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
   +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
   +0 listen(3, 1) = 0

  +.1 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 8>
   +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8>
  +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 320
   +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4

   +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [65536], 4) = 0

   // Close rcv_wnd to zero
  +.01 < . 1:64000(63999) ack 1 win 320
   +.04 > . 1:1(0) ack 64000 win 248
  +.01 < . 64000:128000(64000) ack 1 win 320
   // delayed ack waiting for user to read.
   +0.02~+0.14 > . 1:1(0) ack 128000 win 0

   +0 setsockopt(4, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_WINDOW_CLAMP, [12800], 4) = 0

  +.01 read(4, ..., 129000) = 127999

   // read opens window ; this is the key part of the test.
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 128000 win 50

   // raise clamp further, above buffer size to observe growth
   +0 setsockopt(4, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_WINDOW_CLAMP, [128000], 4) = 0
  +.01 < . 128000:140800(12800) ack 1 win 320
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 140800 win 150

   // Read to clear the receive buffer.
  +.01 read(4, ..., 129000) = 12800

  +.01 < . 140800:172000(31200) ack 1 win 320
   +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 172000 win 361


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ