netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: Dump bound-only sockets in inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231125013942.80997-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:39:42 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <gnault@...hat.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: Dump bound-only sockets in inet_diag.

From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:11:42 +0100
> Walk the hashinfo->bhash2 table so that inet_diag can dump TCP sockets
> that are bound but haven't yet called connect() or listen().
> 
> This allows ss to dump bound-only TCP sockets, together with listening
> sockets (as there's no specific state for bound-only sockets). This is
> similar to the UDP behaviour for which bound-only sockets are already
> dumped by ss -lu.
> 
> The code is inspired by the ->lhash2 loop. However there's no manual
> test of the source port, since this kind of filtering is already
> handled by inet_diag_bc_sk(). Also, a maximum of 16 sockets are dumped
> at a time, to avoid running with bh disabled for too long.
> 
> No change is needed for ss. With an IPv4, an IPv6 and an IPv6-only
> socket, bound respectively to 40000, 64000, 60000, the result is:
> 
>   $ ss -lt
>   State  Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port  Peer Address:PortProcess
>   UNCONN 0      0            0.0.0.0:40000      0.0.0.0:*
>   UNCONN 0      0               [::]:60000         [::]:*
>   UNCONN 0      0                  *:64000            *:*
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
> v2:
>   * Use ->bhash2 instead of ->bhash (Kuniyuki Iwashima).
>   * Process no more than 16 sockets at a time (Kuniyuki Iwashima).
> 
>  net/ipv4/inet_diag.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> index 7d0e7aaa71e0..d7fb6a625cb7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> @@ -1077,10 +1077,96 @@ void inet_diag_dump_icsk(struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		s_i = num = s_num = 0;
>  	}
>  
> +/* Process a maximum of SKARR_SZ sockets at a time when walking hash buckets
> + * with bh disabled.
> + */
> +#define SKARR_SZ 16
> +
> +	/* Dump bound-only sockets */
> +	if (cb->args[0] == 1) {
> +		if (!(idiag_states & TCPF_CLOSE))
> +			goto skip_bind_ht;
> +
> +		for (i = s_i; i < hashinfo->bhash_size; i++) {
> +			struct inet_bind_hashbucket *ibb;
> +			struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb2;
> +			struct sock *sk_arr[SKARR_SZ];
> +			int num_arr[SKARR_SZ];
> +			int idx, accum, res;
> +
> +resume_bind_walk:
> +			num = 0;
> +			accum = 0;
> +			ibb = &hashinfo->bhash2[i];
> +
> +			spin_lock_bh(&ibb->lock);
> +			inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb2, &ibb->chain) {
> +				if (!net_eq(ib2_net(tb2), net))
> +					continue;
> +
> +				sk_for_each_bound_bhash2(sk, &tb2->owners) {
> +					struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
> +
> +					if (num < s_num)
> +						goto next_bind;
> +
> +					if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE ||
> +					    !inet->inet_num)
> +						goto next_bind;
> +
> +					if (r->sdiag_family != AF_UNSPEC &&
> +					    r->sdiag_family != sk->sk_family)
> +						goto next_bind;
> +
> +					if (!inet_diag_bc_sk(bc, sk))
> +						goto next_bind;
> +
> +					if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt))
> +						goto next_bind;

I guess this is copied from the ehash code below, but could
refcount_inc_not_zero() fail for bhash2 under spin_lock_bh() ?


> +
> +					num_arr[accum] = num;
> +					sk_arr[accum] = sk;
> +					if (++accum == SKARR_SZ)
> +						goto pause_bind_walk;
> +next_bind:
> +					num++;
> +				}
> +			}
> +pause_bind_walk:
> +			spin_unlock_bh(&ibb->lock);
> +
> +			res = 0;
> +			for (idx = 0; idx < accum; idx++) {
> +				if (res >= 0) {
> +					res = inet_sk_diag_fill(sk_arr[idx],
> +								NULL, skb, cb,
> +								r, NLM_F_MULTI,
> +								net_admin);
> +					if (res < 0)
> +						num = num_arr[idx];
> +				}
> +				sock_gen_put(sk_arr[idx]);
> +			}
> +			if (res < 0)
> +				goto done;
> +
> +			cond_resched();
> +
> +			if (accum == SKARR_SZ) {
> +				s_num = num + 1;
> +				goto resume_bind_walk;
> +			}
> +
> +			s_num = 0;
> +		}
> +skip_bind_ht:
> +		cb->args[0] = 2;
> +		s_i = num = s_num = 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!(idiag_states & ~TCPF_LISTEN))
>  		goto out;
>  
> -#define SKARR_SZ 16
>  	for (i = s_i; i <= hashinfo->ehash_mask; i++) {
>  		struct inet_ehash_bucket *head = &hashinfo->ehash[i];
>  		spinlock_t *lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, i);
> -- 
> 2.39.2