lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 20:16:29 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<hawk@...nel.org>, <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] skbuff: Optimization of SKB coalescing
 for page pool

On 2023/11/24 15:34, Liang Chen wrote:

...

> --- a/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/helpers.h
> @@ -402,4 +402,26 @@ static inline void page_pool_nid_changed(struct page_pool *pool, int new_nid)
>  		page_pool_update_nid(pool, new_nid);
>  }
>
> +static inline bool page_pool_is_pp_page(struct page *page)
> +{

We have a page->pp_magic checking in napi_pp_put_page() in skbuff.c already,
it seems better to move it to skbuff.c or skbuff.h and use it for
napi_pp_put_page() too, as we seem to have chosen to demux the page_pool
owned page and non-page_pool owned page handling in the skbuff core.

If we move it to skbuff.c or skbuff.h, we might need a better prefix than
page_pool_* too.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ