[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a986069c-3dd0-4054-bbae-06187694dc79@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 17:00:37 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package MMD
read/write
On 11/25/2023 4:54 PM, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:52:19PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/25/2023 4:37 PM, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> Some PHY in PHY package may require to read/write MMD regs to correctly
>>> configure the PHY package.
>>>
>>> Add support for these additional required function in both lock and no
>>> lock variant.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/phy.h | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
>>> index 984bca9a82f4..1799133c8387 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/phy.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/phy.h
>>> @@ -2067,6 +2067,80 @@ static inline int __phy_package_write(struct phy_device *phydev,
>>> return __mdiobus_write(phydev->mdio.bus, addr, regnum, val);
>>> }
>>> +static inline int phy_package_read_mmd(struct phy_device *phydev,
>>> + unsigned int addr_offset, int devad,
>>> + u32 regnum)
>>> +{
>>> + struct phy_package_shared *shared = phydev->shared;
>>> + struct mii_bus *bus = phydev->mdio.bus;
>>> + int addr, val;
>>> +
>>> + if (!shared || shared->base_addr + addr_offset > PHY_MAX_ADDR)
>>> + return -EIO;
>>
>> You might be off by one here, should not that >= PHY_MAX_ADDR here and
>> below?
>
> Thanks for the review. Yes PHY_MAX_ADDR is 32 so I should use >=.
>
> (interesting choice to use 32 instead of 31 as MAX, guess an old mistake)
It has historically been used as an iterator upper bound, hence the 32.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists