netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/9] Create a binding for the Marvell MV88E6xxx DSA switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 21:17:08 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, 
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, 
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>, 
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/9] Create a binding for the Marvell
 MV88E6xxx DSA switches

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:50 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:50 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > So i have one open question. How do we merge this?
> >
> > Can we just take it all through the DT tree?
>
> If we don't expect the affected DTS files to have orthogonal
> modifications we certainly could, if the respective subarch
> mainatiners are OK with it and can ACK that approach.
>
> For Marvell that's you I guess :)
>
> For NXP VF that's Shawn Guo, Shawn are you OK with
> these changes going through the net tree?

Shawn is busy I guess, but looking at the activity in arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp
iIt seems pretty risk-free to apply.

An alternative is to simply apply all but patch 4/9 (the NXP patch), because
the rest is Andrew territory.

Yours,
Linus Walleij