[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c51aa08d-944f-4d91-9cd0-c8a6ff6ceace@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:57:08 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfc: llcp_sock_sendmsg: Reformat code to make the
smaller block indented
On 25/11/2023 21:26, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> The block for datagram sending is a significantly bigger chunk of the
> function compared to the other scenario.
>
> Thus, put the significantly smaller block inside the if-block.
>
>
> + if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_BOUND) {
> release_sock(sk);
> -
> - return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
> - msg, len);
> + return -ENOTCONN;
> }
>
> - if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_CONNECTED) {
> + DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_nfc_llcp *, addr, msg->msg_name);
No, this code is not readable. I don't think this change helps in anything.
> +
> + if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(*addr)) {
> release_sock(sk);
> - return -ENOTCONN;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> release_sock(sk);
>
> - return nfc_llcp_send_i_frame(llcp_sock, msg, len);
> + return nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(llcp_sock, addr->dsap, addr->ssap,
> + msg, len);
> +
Stray blank line.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists