netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/2] octeontx2-af: Add new mbox to support multicast/mirror offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:48:06 +0100
From: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>, <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
	<gakula@...vell.com>, <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lcherian@...vell.com>, <jerinj@...vell.com>,
	<horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/2] octeontx2-af: Add new mbox to support
 multicast/mirror offload



On 26.11.2023 19:43, Suman Ghosh wrote:
> A new mailbox is added to support offloading of multicast/mirror
> functionality. The mailbox also supports dynamic updation of the
> multicast/mirror list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>
> ---
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h  |  72 ++
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c   |   6 +-
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.h   |  39 +-
>  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_nix.c   | 701 +++++++++++++++++-
>  .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc.c   |  14 +-
>  .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c         |  73 +-
>  6 files changed, 867 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 

<...>

> +
> +static int nix_add_mce_list_entry(struct rvu *rvu,
> +				  struct nix_hw *nix_hw,
> +				  struct nix_mcast_grp_elem *elem,
> +				  struct nix_mcast_grp_update_req *req)
> +{
> +	u32 num_entry = req->num_mce_entry;
> +	struct nix_mce_list *mce_list;
> +	struct mce *mce;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	mce_list = &elem->mcast_mce_list;
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_entry; i++) {
> +		mce = kzalloc(sizeof(*mce), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!mce)
> +			goto free_mce;
> +
> +		mce->pcifunc = req->pcifunc[i];
> +		mce->channel = req->channel[i];
> +		mce->rq_rss_index = req->rq_rss_index[i];
> +		mce->dest_type = req->dest_type[i];
> +		mce->is_active = 1;
> +		hlist_add_head(&mce->node, &mce_list->head);
> +		mce_list->count++;
> +	}
> +
> +	mce_list->max += num_entry;
> +
> +	/* Dump the updated list to HW */
> +	if (elem->dir == NIX_MCAST_INGRESS)
> +		return nix_update_ingress_mce_list_hw(rvu, nix_hw, elem);
> +
> +	nix_update_egress_mce_list_hw(rvu, nix_hw, elem);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +free_mce:
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(mce, &mce_list->head, node) {

I belive that hlist_for_each_entry_safe should be used when deleting list entries.

> +		hlist_del(&mce->node);
> +		kfree(mce);
> +		mce_list->count--;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
>  static int nix_update_mce_list_entry(struct nix_mce_list *mce_list,
>  				     u16 pcifunc, bool add)
>  {
> @@ -3079,6 +3301,7 @@ int nix_update_mce_list(struct rvu *rvu, u16 pcifunc,
>  		/* EOL should be set in last MCE */
>  		err = nix_blk_setup_mce(rvu, nix_hw, idx, NIX_AQ_INSTOP_WRITE,
>  					mce->pcifunc, next_idx,
> +					0, 1,
>  					(next_idx > last_idx) ? true : false);
>  		if (err)
>  			goto end;

<...>