[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231127084109.44235-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:41:09 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kerneljasonxing@...il.com,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH iwl-next] i40e: remove fake support of rx-frames-irq
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Since we never support this feature for I40E driver, we don't have to
display the value when using 'ethtool -c eth0'.
Before this patch applied, the rx-frames-irq is 256 which is consistent
with tx-frames-irq. Apparently it could mislead users.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
index eb9a7b32af73..2a0a12a79aa3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
@@ -2895,7 +2895,6 @@ static int __i40e_get_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi;
ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq = vsi->work_limit;
- ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq = vsi->work_limit;
/* rx and tx usecs has per queue value. If user doesn't specify the
* queue, return queue 0's value to represent.
@@ -3029,7 +3028,7 @@ static int __i40e_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
struct i40e_pf *pf = vsi->back;
int i;
- if (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq || ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq)
+ if (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq)
vsi->work_limit = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq;
if (queue < 0) {
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists