[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231127190222.293afaec@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 19:02:22 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-af: Check return value of nix_get_nixlf
before using nixlf
On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:04:58 +0530 Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> If a NIXLF is not attached to a PF/VF device then
> nix_get_nixlf function fails and returns proper error
> code. But npc_get_default_entry_action does not check it
> and uses garbage value in subsequent calls. Fix this
> by cheking the return value of nix_get_nixlf.
>
> Fixes: 967db3529eca ("octeontx2-af: add support for multicast/promisc packet replication feature")
You need to run the patch thru scripts/get_maintainer,
here you missed CCing Naveen, who authored 967db3529eca.
Also lcherian@...vell.com and jerinj@...vell.com
LMK if these people are no longer at marvell, I can add their
addresses to our ignore list.
Same goes for the pauseparam patch, you'll need to repost the two.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists