lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:52:48 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <>
To: Min Li <>
Cc: Min Li <>, ""
 <>, "" <>,
 "" <>,
 "" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ptp: introduce PTP_CLOCK_EXTOFF event for
 the measured external offset

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:59:38 +0000 Min Li wrote:
> But the driver that I submitted is a brand new PHC driver. So I don't
> know if it is appropriate to separate them to net and net-next?
> Because the driver change depends on the this patch.

What's in your tree? What I'm saying is that the diff context does not
match net-next:

$ git checkout net-next/main
$ git pw series apply 804642
Applying: ptp: introduce PTP_CLOCK_EXTOFF event for the measured external offset
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
Applying: ptp: add FemtoClock3 Wireless as ptp hardware clock

Do you have any intermediate commits in your local branch? 
Or perhaps the patches are based on some other tree, not net-next?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists