netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/16] IOMMU memory observability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231129005450.GH1312390@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:54:50 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alex.williamson@...hat.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
	alyssa@...enzweig.io, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
	baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, david@...hat.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, heiko@...ech.de,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, jasowang@...hat.com,
	jernej.skrabec@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, joro@...tes.org,
	kevin.tian@...el.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
	marcan@...can.st, mhiramat@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	paulmck@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, robin.murphy@....com,
	samuel@...lland.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
	sven@...npeter.dev, thierry.reding@...il.com, tj@...nel.org,
	tomas.mudrunka@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, wens@...e.org, will@...nel.org,
	yu-cheng.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] IOMMU memory observability

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:30:27PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:28 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:25:03PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > > > > Right, but as I mention above, if userspace starts depending on this
> > > > > equation, we won't be able to add any more classes of "secondary" page
> > > > > tables to SecPageTables. I'd like to avoid that if possible. We can do
> > > > > the subtraction in the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > What Sean had suggested was that SecPageTables was always intended to
> > > > account all the non-primary mmu memory used by page tables. If this is
> > > > the case we shouldn't be trying to break it apart into finer
> > > > counters. These are big picture counters, not detailed allocation by
> > > > owner counters.
> > >
> > > Right, I agree with that, but if SecPageTables includes page tables
> > > from multiple sources, and it is observed to be suspiciously high, the
> > > logical next step is to try to find the culprit, right?
> >
> > You can make that case already, if it is high wouldn't you want to
> > find the exact VMM process that was making it high?
> >
> > It is a sign of fire, not a detailed debug tool.
> 
> Fair enough. We can always add separate counters later if needed,
> potentially under KVM stats to get more fine-grained details as you
> mentioned.
> 
> I am only worried about users subtracting the iommu-only counter to
> get a KVM counter. We should at least document that  SecPageTables may
> be expanded to include other sources later to avoid that.

Well, we just broke it already, anyone thinking it was only kvm
counters is going to be sad now :) As I understand it was already
described to be more general that kvm so probably nothing to do really

Jason