[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231129021112.94372-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:11:12 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <horms@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 8/8] tcp: Factorise cookie-dependent fields initialisation in cookie_v[46]_check()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:42:38 +0100
> > @@ -337,40 +326,36 @@ struct request_sock *cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops,
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > + ireq = inet_rsk(req);
> > + treq = tcp_rsk(req);
> > +
> > + req->mss = mss;
> > + req->ts_recent = tcp_opt->saw_tstamp ? tcp_opt->rcv_tsval : 0;
> > +
> > + ireq->snd_wscale = tcp_opt->snd_wscale;
> > + ireq->tstamp_ok = tcp_opt->saw_tstamp;
> > + ireq->sack_ok = tcp_opt->sack_ok;
> > + ireq->wscale_ok = tcp_opt->wscale_ok;
> > + ireq->ecn_ok = tcp_opt->rcv_tsecr & TS_OPT_ECN;
>
> I doubt this will do what you/we want, because ireq->ecn is not a
> bool, it is a one bit field
> and TS_OPT_ECN != 1.
>
> I would have used instead :
>
> ireq->ecn_ok = !!(tcp_opt->rcv_tsecr & TS_OPT_ECN);
Ah exactly, it was buggy. I'll fix it in v3.
Thanks for catching!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists