[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pewqjb3y45q4s5ffqxwavss5hz2ub5eeucms7egopbfpjq4bnr@rnjezpz2xgsu>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:30:54 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...rdevices.ru,
oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] vsock: update SO_RCVLOWAT setting callback
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:25:17AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>Do not return if transport callback for SO_RCVLOWAT is set (only in
>error case). In this case we don't need to set 'sk_rcvlowat' field in
>each transport - only in 'vsock_set_rcvlowat()'. Also, if 'sk_rcvlowat'
>is now set only in af_vsock.c, change callback name from 'set_rcvlowat'
>to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
>---
> Changelog:
> v3 -> v4:
> * Rename 'set_rcvlowat' to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
> * Commit message updated.
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 2 +-
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>index e302c0e804d0..535701efc1e5 100644
>--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>@@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> u64 (*stream_rcvhiwat)(struct vsock_sock *);
> bool (*stream_is_active)(struct vsock_sock *);
> bool (*stream_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
>- int (*set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
>
> /* SEQ_PACKET. */
> ssize_t (*seqpacket_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
>@@ -168,6 +167,7 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *);
> /* sk_lock held by the caller */
> void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
>+ int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
>
> /* Shutdown. */
> int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 816725af281f..54ba7316f808 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -2264,8 +2264,13 @@ static int vsock_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
>
> transport = vsk->transport;
>
>- if (transport && transport->set_rcvlowat)
>- return transport->set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
>+ if (transport && transport->notify_set_rcvlowat) {
>+ int err;
>+
>+ err = transport->notify_set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
>+ if (err)
>+ return err;
>+ }
>
> WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvlowat, val ? : 1);
> return 0;
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>index 7cb1a9d2cdb4..e2157e387217 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, ssize_t written,
> }
>
> static
>-int hvs_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
>+int hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = {
> .notify_send_pre_enqueue = hvs_notify_send_pre_enqueue,
> .notify_send_post_enqueue = hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue,
>
>- .set_rcvlowat = hvs_set_rcvlowat
>+ .notify_set_rcvlowat = hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat
> };
>
> static bool hvs_check_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>--
>2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists