netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: page_pool: fix null-ptr-deref in page_pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iJT_dkpK2+9pAE376om6gDem7VKtCuALwPLc3AUWL8M8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:06:20 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
Cc: almasrymina@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, hawk@...nel.org, 
	ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	syzbot+f9f8efb58a4db2ca98d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com, 
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: page_pool: fix null-ptr-deref in page_pool_unlist

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 9:58 AM Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:29:04 +0100, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > [Syz report]
> > > Illegal XDP return value 4294946546 on prog  (id 2) dev N/A, expect packet loss!
> > > general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> > > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
> > > CPU: 0 PID: 5064 Comm: syz-executor391 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-syzkaller-00533-ga379972973a8 #0
> > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023
> > > RIP: 0010:__hlist_del include/linux/list.h:988 [inline]
> > > RIP: 0010:hlist_del include/linux/list.h:1002 [inline]
> > > RIP: 0010:page_pool_unlist+0xd1/0x170 net/core/page_pool_user.c:342
> > > Code: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 90 00 00 00 4c 8b a3 f0 06 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 75 68 48 85 ed 49 89 2c 24 74 24 e8 1b ca 07 f9 48 8d
> > > RSP: 0018:ffffc900039ff768 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88814ae02000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffff88814ae026f0
> > > RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff1d57fdc
> > > R10: ffffffff8eabfee3 R11: ffffffff8aa0008b R12: 0000000000000000
> > > R13: ffff88814ae02000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
> > > FS:  000055555717a380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > CR2: 0000000002555398 CR3: 0000000025044000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
> > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  <TASK>
> > >  __page_pool_destroy net/core/page_pool.c:851 [inline]
> > >  page_pool_release+0x507/0x6b0 net/core/page_pool.c:891
> > >  page_pool_destroy+0x1ac/0x4c0 net/core/page_pool.c:956
> > >  xdp_test_run_teardown net/bpf/test_run.c:216 [inline]
> > >  bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x1578/0x1af0 net/bpf/test_run.c:388
> > >  bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x827/0x1530 net/bpf/test_run.c:1254
> > >  bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4041 [inline]
> > >  __sys_bpf+0x11bf/0x4920 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5402
> > >  __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5488 [inline]
> > >  __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5486 [inline]
> > >  __x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5486
> > >  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
> > >  do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
> > >
> > > [Analysis]
> > > If "user.list" is initialized, the corresponding slow.netdev device must exist,
> > > so before recycling "user.list", it is necessary to confirm that the "slow.netdev"
> > > device is valid.
> > >
> > > [Fix]
> > > Add slow.netdev != NULL check before delete "user.list".
> > >
> > > Fixes: 083772c9f972 ("net: page_pool: record pools per netdev")
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+f9f8efb58a4db2ca98d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > I sent a fix already ?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89i+6BuZA6AjocG_0zTkD1u=pNgZc_DpZMO=yUN=S1cHS3w@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Please do not attribute to yourself work done by others, let me submit
> > the fix formally, thanks.
> What exists may not necessarily be right, and how do you prove that I saw your
> fix before fixing it?
>
> You have only tested on syzbot, that's all.
> This does not mean that others should refer to you for repairs, nor does it
> prove that you have made repairs, and others cannot fix them.

I am just saying I sent a fix already, and that it was sent a few
minutes after the syzbot report was available.

(You included syzbot+f9f8efb58a4db2ca98d0@...kaller.appspotmail.com in
your report, meaning that you must have seen my patch)

It is not because I sleep during night time that you can decide to use
my work without any credits.