lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231201172716.182693-1-jtornosm@redhat.com>
Date: Fri,  1 Dec 2023 18:27:14 +0100
From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>
To: stern@...land.harvard.edu
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	greg@...ah.com,
	jtornosm@...hat.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	oneukum@...e.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: usb: ax88179_178a: avoid failed operations when device is disconnected

Hi Alan,

> Would it be good enough just to check for ret != -ENODEV and not do the 
> stopping_unbinding check at all?
I thought about that but if possible, I would like to ignore the failed
operation messages only under a controlled and expected situation. 
I think that if there is a problem with the device it will be easier to
analyze it later with all the possible information.
But this is my opinion ...

Thank you

Best regards
José Ignacio


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ