netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 2/2] selftests/dpll: add DPLL system integration selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231130225127.1b56ffca@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:51:27 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@...el.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, "Kubalewski,
 Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, "jonathan.lemon@...il.com"
 <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, poros
 <poros@...hat.com>, "Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@...el.com>, mschmidt
 <mschmidt@...hat.com>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
 "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
 <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 2/2] selftests/dpll: add DPLL system
 integration selftests

On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:46:37 +0000 Michalik, Michal wrote:
> > Did you try to run it in vmtest or virtme-ng?
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT-325hgXjY
> > https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1506/attachments/1143/2441/virtme-ng.pdf
> > 
> > I'm thinking of using those for continuous testing, curious all 
> > the Python setup works okay with them.  
> 
> Very interesting idea, I didn't try to use those - will get familiar with that and
> see if I can make any improvements to go with vmtest/virtme-ng before I will send
> out the RFC v5.

LMK how it goes. I tried using both today and they work fine if I let
them build the kernel, but if I tried to use my own kernel build they
just hang :(

> > Did you see what the sdsi test does? It seems to assume everything 
> > is installed locally, without the venv. I wonder if that may be simpler
> > to get going with vmtest?  
> 
> To be honest I did not see that. I agree that this is a simpler solution, but I am
> not sure if that is not "too simple". What I mean, I'm not sure who wrote the sdsi
> tests, but maybe they were not aware about the Python best practices? Python used
> to be my first language, and I would vote for using the venvs if you asked me.
> I understand that it haven't been done before, but we are here to try to improve
> the things, yes? 

I think I already asked how long the setup takes but my only concern 
is that the setup will be slower, and less useful during development.

> Of course if you outvote me, I won't act as Tadeusz Rejtan in
> Matejko's painting "The Fall of Poland" and just remove the virtual environments. :)

:D
The infallible strategy of showing a nipple.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY0V65YWEIA&t=50s