[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymKa65a7O=YHqbjm3042+HusyP2t0m_ocf6RXkaRTwjnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:36:10 -0500
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
mubashirq@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, andrew@...n.ch, corbet@....net,
dsahern@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
wwchao@...gle.com, weiwan@...gle.com, pnemavat@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 0/5] Analyze and Reorganize core Networking
Structs to optimize cacheline consumption
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 5:30 PM <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:27:51 +0000 you wrote:
> > Currently, variable-heavy structs in the networking stack is organized
> > chronologically, logically and sometimes by cacheline access.
> >
> > This patch series attempts to reorganize the core networking stack
> > variables to minimize cacheline consumption during the phase of data
> > transfer. Specifically, we looked at the TCP/IP stack and the fast
> > path definition in TCP.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Here is the summary with links:
> - [v8,net-next,1/5] Documentations: Analyze heavily used Networking related structs
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/14006f1d8fa2
> - [v8,net-next,2/5] cache: enforce cache groups
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/aeb9ce058d7c
> - [v8,net-next,3/5] netns-ipv4: reorganize netns_ipv4 fast path variables
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/18fd64d25422
> - [v8,net-next,4/5] net-device: reorganize net_device fast path variables
> (no matching commit)
> - [v8,net-next,5/5] tcp: reorganize tcp_sock fast path variables
> (no matching commit)
Both from this email and the git logs it looks like the last two
commits didn't make it in? Is that intentional? :-)
cheers,
neal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists