[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8aebcd8-4d71-49c9-853d-d17647e69308@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:52:52 -0300
From: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, marcelo.leitner@...il.com, vladbu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net/sched: act_api: conditional notification
of events
On 02/12/2023 16:21, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:43:13 -0300 Pedro Tammela wrote:
>> --- a/net/sched/act_api.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
>> @@ -1791,6 +1791,13 @@ tcf_reoffload_del_notify(struct net *net, struct tc_action *action)
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (!tc_should_notify(net, 0)) {
>> + ret = tcf_idr_release_unsafe(action);
>> + if (ret == ACT_P_DELETED)
>> + module_put(ops->owner);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> I fell like we can do better than this.. let's refactor this code a bit
> harder. Maybe factor out the alloc_skb() and fill()? Then add a wrapper
> around rtnetlink_send() which does nothing if skb is NULL?
Ack
Powered by blists - more mailing lists