netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=ZgoeXQAZZoLNYmd0OyuHktsnxLtcKzH4MEoDkPXnqyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:28:21 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, 
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, 
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, 
	davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, 
	andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, 
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, 
	sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, keescook@...omium.org, nathan@...nel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, 
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, jpoimboe@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, 
	mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:54 PM Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 3:15 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > So the kCFI thing is 'new' but readily inspected by objdump or godbolt:
> >
> >   https://godbolt.org/z/sGe18z3ca
> >
> > (@Sami, that .Ltmp15 thing, I don't see that in the kernel, what
> > compiler flag makes that go away?)
>
> Hmm, that looks like that's what we emit to .kcfi_traps. I suppose
> Godbolt just doesn't show the section directives?

Filter > [uncheck] Directives

>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/kcfi.ll#L30
>
> Sami



-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers