netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/6] doc/netlink/specs: Add a spec for tc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m2zfyq53wz.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 16:27:24 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,  "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,  Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,  Jonathan
 Corbet <corbet@....net>,  linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,  Jacob Keller
 <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,  donald.hunter@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/6] doc/netlink/specs: Add a spec for tc

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:49:58 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote:
>> +      -
>> +        name: app
>> +        type: binary # TODO sub-message needs 2+ level deep lookup
>> +        sub-message: tca-stats-app-msg
>> +        selector: kind
>
> Ugh. Meaning the selector is at a "previous" level of nesting?

That's right. I wonder if we should use a relative syntax like "../kind"
for the selector. Will either need to pass the known attrs to nest
parsing, or pass a resolver instead?