| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20231205.110618.1499275558053658998.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 11:06:18 +0900 (JST) From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com> To: jarkko@...nel.org Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, tmgross@...ch.edu, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, wedsonaf@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, boqun.feng@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 1/4] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 03:43:50 +0200 "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote: > On Tue Dec 5, 2023 at 3:14 AM EET, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> This patch adds abstractions to implement network PHY drivers; the >> driver registration and bindings for some of callback functions in >> struct phy_driver and many genphy_ functions. >> >> This feature is enabled with CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB_ABSTRACTIONS=y. > > Just a question: is `_ABSTRACTIONS` a convention or just for this > config flag? It's a convention. https://docs.kernel.org/rust/general-information.html#abstractions-vs-bindings > That would read anyway that this rust absraction of phy absraction > layer or similar. > > Why not e.g. > > - `CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB_BINDINGS` > - `CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB_API` > - Or even just `CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB`? I guess that CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB_API or CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB could be used. CONFIG_RUST_PHYLIB_ABSTRACTIONS was preferred during the past reviewing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists