netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] virtio/vsock: fix logic which reduces credit update messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:54:37 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, 
	Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...rdevices.ru, 
	oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] virtio/vsock: fix logic which reduces
 credit update messages

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:48:05AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>Add one more condition for sending credit update during dequeue from
>stream socket: when number of bytes in the rx queue is smaller than
>SO_RCVLOWAT value of the socket. This is actual for non-default value
>of SO_RCVLOWAT (e.g. not 1) - idea is to "kick" peer to continue data
>transmission, because we need at least SO_RCVLOWAT bytes in our rx
>queue to wake up user for reading data (in corner case it is also
>possible to stuck both tx and rx sides, this is why 'Fixes' is used).
>
>Fixes: b89d882dc9fc ("vsock/virtio: reduce credit update messages")
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index e137d740804e..461c89882142 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
> 	size_t bytes, total = 0;
> 	struct sk_buff *skb;
>+	bool low_rx_bytes;
> 	int err = -EFAULT;
> 	u32 free_space;
>
>@@ -602,6 +603,8 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	}
>
> 	free_space = vvs->buf_alloc - (vvs->fwd_cnt - vvs->last_fwd_cnt);
>+	low_rx_bytes = (vvs->rx_bytes <
>+			sock_rcvlowat(sk_vsock(vsk), 0, INT_MAX));

As in the previous patch, should we avoid the update it if `fwd_cnt` and 
`last_fwd_cnt` are the same?

Now I'm thinking if it is better to add that check directly in 
virtio_transport_send_credit_update().

Stefano

>
> 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
>@@ -611,9 +614,11 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	 * too high causes extra messages. Too low causes transmitter
> 	 * stalls. As stalls are in theory more expensive than extra
> 	 * messages, we set the limit to a high value. TODO: experiment
>-	 * with different values.
>+	 * with different values. Also send credit update message when
>+	 * number of bytes in rx queue is not enough to wake up reader.
> 	 */
>-	if (free_space < VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
>+	if (free_space < VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE ||
>+	    low_rx_bytes)
> 		virtio_transport_send_credit_update(vsk);
>
> 	return total;
>-- 
>2.25.1
>