netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] net: pse-pd: Add PD692x0 PSE controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88ed0c94-d052-4564-be0c-79a0f502eda8@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:57:28 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] net: pse-pd: Add PD692x0 PSE controller
 driver

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:02:03PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 12:55:18PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 07:45:27AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:

> > > CC regulator devs here too.

> > Again, I'm not sure what if any question there is?

> PSE is kind of PMIC for Ethernet ports. I assume, it is good to let you
> know at least about existence drivers.

OK...  I mean, if they're not using the regulator framework I'm not sure
it has much impact - there are plenty of internal regulators in devices
already so it wouldn't be *too* unusual other than the fact that AFAICT
this is somewhat split between devices within the subsystem?  Neither of
the messages was super clear.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)