netdev - Re: [PATCH net] tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iK++qfrGEg=2dxfFLXc_SAOUvjwTgtt55L8yRZbVW8a2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:19:32 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, 
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
	Yepeng Pan <yepeng.pan@...pa.de>, Christian Rossow <rossow@...pa.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:47 PM Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> wrote:

> Thank you Eric for the fix. It appears the newer RFC
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.html also has this issue that
> needs a revision?

I do not think RFC 9293 made any refinement about RFC 5961 guidelines.

Perhaps Yepeng Pan and Christian Rossow have plans to bring this issue to IETF.