[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18c3b02a1ef.6fec9cb996724.8771055654191224615@siddh.me>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 22:54:37 +0530
From: Siddh Raman Pant <sanganaka@...dh.me>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Suman Ghosh" <sumang@...vell.com>,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+bbe84a4010eeea00982d"
<syzbot+bbe84a4010eeea00982d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] nfc: llcp_core: Hold a ref to
llcp_local->dev when holding a ref to llcp_local
On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 22:51:17 +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> I agree, it was something I thought about as well. There should be a
> new function for refcount increment. Maybe the existing one could be
> renamed to nfc_get_device_from_idx() and a new nfc_get_device() be
> defined.
Or nfc_find_device() instead of nfc_get_device_from_idx().
Thanks,
Siddh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists