[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKFqxdCgDJTM-AXVZBBaXmv=Y51K1cfA48QEriUV5QT=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:35:31 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io>
Cc: ralf@...ux-mips.org, imv4bel@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net/rose: Fix Use-After-Free in rose_ioctl
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:13 PM Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@...ori.io> wrote:
>
> ---
> net/rose/af_rose.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> index 0cc5a4e19900..7ff76bf3f56e 100644
> --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
> +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> @@ -1316,8 +1316,10 @@ static int rose_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> long amount = 0L;
> /* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only user tasks fiddle here */
Can you remove this stale and confused comment ?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists