[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231208091408.071680db@device.home>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:14:08 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Jiangfeng Ma <Jiangfeng.Ma@...opsys.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu
<Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Shenwei Wang
<shenwei.wang@....com>, Johannes Zink <j.zink@...gutronix.de>, "Russell
King (Oracle" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Jochen Henneberg
<jh@...neberg-systemdesign.com>, "open list:STMMAC ETHERNET DRIVER"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, "moderated list:ARM/STM32
ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, James Li <James.Li1@...opsys.com>, Martin
McKenny <Martin.McKenny@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net:stmmac:stmmac_platform:Add snps,xpcs devicetree
parsing
Hello,
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 07:02:19 +0000
Jiangfeng Ma <Jiangfeng.Ma@...opsys.com> wrote:
> In order to setup xpcs, has_xpcs must be set to a non-zero value.
> Add new optional devicetree properties representing this.
>
> If has_xpcs is set to true, then xpcs_an_inband should preferably be
> consistent with it, Otherwise, some errors may occur when starting
> the network, For example, the phy interface that xpcs already supports,
> but link up fails.
Can you elaborate on why you need this, and on which platform
especially ? Usually drivers for the various stmmac variants know if
they have XPCS or not, or can guess it based on some info such as the
configured PHY mode (dwmac-intel).
Besides that, there are a few issues with your submission. If DT is the
way to go (and I don't say it is), you would also need to update the
bindings to document that property.
> The types of has_xpcs and xpcs_an_inband are unsigned int,
> and generally used as flags. So it may be more reasonable to set them to
> bool type. This can also be confirmed from the type of @ovr_an_inband.
And this part would go into a separate patch.
Thanks,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists