netdev - Re: [PATCH wpan-next v5 01/11] ieee802154: Let PAN IDs be reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:21:14 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Girault <david.girault@...vo.com>, Romuald
 Despres <romuald.despres@...vo.com>, Frederic Blain
 <frederic.blain@...vo.com>, Nicolas Schodet <nico@...fr.eu.org>, Guilhem
 Imberton <guilhem.imberton@...vo.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan-next v5 01/11] ieee802154: Let PAN IDs be reset

Hi Stefan,

stefan@...enfreihafen.org wrote on Thu, 7 Dec 2023 21:27:59 +0100:

> Hello Miquel,
> 
> 
> On 20.11.23 12:01, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 18:12:04 UTC, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> >> Soon association and disassociation will be implemented, which will
> >> require to be able to either change the PAN ID from 0xFFFF to a real
> >> value when association succeeded, or to reset the PAN ID to 0xFFFF upon
> >> disassociation. Let's allow to do that manually for now.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>  
> > 
> > Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wpan/wpan-next.git staging.  
> 
> I can't see this, or any other patch from the series, in the staging branch. Did you forget to push this out to kernel.org?

Oh! Thanks for spotting this, I actually pushed the branch (otherwise
the hook would not have sent these messages) but the push operation
apparently failed at some point so the tip of the branch was not
updated. This is now fixed.

Thanks for the reviews by the way.

Miquèl