lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXKf8f/hjw1K6Qyp@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 12:47:45 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, saeedm@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tariqt@...dia.com, jianbol@...dia.com, leonro@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [net V2 08/14] net/mlx5e: Check the number of elements before
 walk TC rhashtable

Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
> 
> After IPSec TX tables are destroyed, the flow rules in TC rhashtable,
> which have the destination to IPSec, are restored to the original
> one, the uplink.
> 
> However, when the device is in switchdev mode and unload driver with
> IPSec rules configured, TC rhashtable cleanup is done before IPSec
> cleanup, which means tc_ht->tbl is already freed when walking TC
> rhashtable, in order to restore the destination. So add the checking
> before walking to avoid unexpected behavior.

I'm confused.  If the rhashtable has already been freed, then
surely you can't even read nelems?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ