netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] net: stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Refactor code for loongson_dwmac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <155320bf-94d0-4e30-9283-d8ad178a323f@loongson.cn>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:46:16 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
 alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, fancer.lancer@...il.com,
 Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, chenhuacai@...ngson.cn, linux@...linux.org.uk,
 dongbiao@...ngson.cn, guyinggang@...ngson.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] net: stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Refactor code for
 loongson_dwmac_probe()


在 2023/11/12 04:19, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 05:25:43PM +0800, Yanteng Si wrote:
>> Add a setup() function to initialize data, and simplify code for
>> loongson_dwmac_probe().
> This does not look like a refactoring patch. Such patches just move
> code around, but otherwise leave the code alone. There are real
> changes in here.
>
>> -	if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "loongson, pci-gmac")) {
>> -		pr_info("dwmac_loongson_pci: Incompatible OF node\n");
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -	}
>> -
> This just disappears. Why is it no longer needed?
>
>
>>   	plat = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*plat), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	if (!plat)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> +	plat->mdio_bus_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> +					   sizeof(*plat->mdio_bus_data),
>> +					   GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!plat->mdio_bus_data)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	plat->dma_cfg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*plat->dma_cfg),
>> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!plat->dma_cfg)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>>   	plat->mdio_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
>>   	if (plat->mdio_node) {
>>   		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Found MDIO subnode\n");
>> -
>> -		plat->mdio_bus_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> -						   sizeof(*plat->mdio_bus_data),
>> -						   GFP_KERNEL);
>> -		if (!plat->mdio_bus_data) {
>> -			ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -			goto err_put_node;
>> -		}
> MDIO was conditional, but now is mandatory. Why?
>
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: ERROR: failed to enable device\n", __func__);
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: ERROR: failed to enable device\n",
>> +			__func__);
> Changes like this are a distraction. The reviewer is trying to
> understand what has changed and why. If you want to make white space
> changes, please do it in a patch of its own.
>
> Please break this patch up into lots of smaller parts, each with a
> good commit messaged explaining what is going on, and importantly,
> why.


OK,Iwillgiveitatry.


Thanks,

Yanteng

>
> 	Andrew