[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3231a5d7-29bc-4464-a26c-803b95774f86@kylinos.cn>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:32:01 +0800
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
karol.kolacinski@...el.com
Cc: michal.michalik@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ice: Fix some null pointer dereference issues in
ice_ptp.c
Thanks for your suggestion.
I made the patch based on linux-next.git(tag:next-20231211).
Our code is just self-similar, i didn't override the old name.
I keep the logic as it was before.
The newest code is:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c#n2747
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c#n2993
I'll update v2 patch with:
1. update suject prefix to "[PATCH v2 iwl-next]"
2. remove 'dev_err'
Thanks again,
Kunwu
On 2023/12/11 15:15, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 12/11/23 07:26, Kunwu Chan wrote:
>> devm_kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory
>> which can be NULL upon failure.
>>
>> Fixes: d938a8cca88a ("ice: Auxbus devices & driver for E822 TS")
>> Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@...mail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
>
> I would suggest adding "iwl-net" as a target here
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
>> index 1eddcbe89b0c..59794ce4f243 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
>> @@ -2668,6 +2668,8 @@ static int ice_ptp_register_auxbus_driver(struct
>> ice_pf *pf)
>> name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ptp_aux_dev_%u_%u_clk%u",
>> pf->pdev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(pf->pdev->devfn),
>> ice_get_ptp_src_clock_index(&pf->hw));
>> + if (!name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> aux_driver->name = name;
>> aux_driver->shutdown = ice_ptp_auxbus_shutdown;
>> @@ -2929,6 +2931,10 @@ static int ice_ptp_create_auxbus_device(struct
>> ice_pf *pf)
>> name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "ptp_aux_dev_%u_%u_clk%u",
>> pf->pdev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(pf->pdev->devfn),
>> ice_get_ptp_src_clock_index(&pf->hw));
>> + if (!name) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate memory\n");
>
> Kuba @ [1]:
> no warnings on allocation failures, there will be a splat for GFP_KERNEL
> (checkpatch should catch this)
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231206195304.6226771d@kernel.org/T/
>
> so just "return -ENOMEM" would be sufficient
>
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> aux_dev->name = name;
>> aux_dev->id = id;
>
> I didn't checked but having same code in two places raises questions.
> Are you overwriting old name here, or our code is just self similar?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists