netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: Document QCA808x PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b4d8d01-8082-41fb-91f3-5ae5c3ca5bfe@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:01:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: Document QCA808x PHYs

On 11/12/2023 13:18, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>> +  QCA808X PHYs can have up to 3 LEDs attached.
>>> +  All 3 LEDs are disabled by default.
>>> +  2 LEDs have dedicated pins with the 3rd LED having the
>>> +  double function of Interrupt LEDs/GPIO or additional LED.
>>> +
>>> +  By default this special PIN is set to LED function.
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +select:
>>> +  properties:
>>> +    compatible:
>>> +      contains:
>>> +        enum:
>>> +          - ethernet-phy-id004d.d101
>>
>> I have impression that this is continuation of some other patchset...
>> Anyway, id004d.d101 is specific to QCA808x?
>>
> 
> I used enum assuming eventually more qca808x PHY will come... Yes that
> ID is specific and it's the id of QCA8081. Better to use const?

No, it is fine. I just wanted to be sure that this will not be matched
by other bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof