lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 13:39:25 -0800
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	ast@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, 
	hawk@...nel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com, antony.antony@...unet.com, 
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, 
	mykolal@...com, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, 
	sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] bpf: xfrm: Add selftest for bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state()

Hi Daniel,

Tiny nits below in case you respin this for other reasons:

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
> This commit extends test_tunnel selftest to test the new XDP xfrm state
> lookup kfunc.
>
> Co-developed-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c    | 20 ++++++--
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c    | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
> index 2d7f8fa82ebd..fc804095d578 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_tunnel.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>         SYS(fail,
>             "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
>                 "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> -                       "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel "
> +                       "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
>                         "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
>             IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
>         SYS(fail,
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>         SYS(fail,
>             "ip netns exec at_ns0 "
>                 "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> -                       "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel "
> +                       "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "

nit: why do you need to set the replay-window in both directions?

>                         "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96 enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
>             IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
>         SYS(fail,
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>          */
>         SYS(fail,
>             "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> -                   "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel "
> +                   "spi %d reqid 1 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
>                     "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96  enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
>             IP4_ADDR_VETH0, IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, XFRM_SPI_IN_TO_OUT, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
>         SYS(fail,
> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int add_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>         /* root -> at_ns0 */
>         SYS(fail,
>             "ip xfrm state add src %s dst %s proto esp "
> -                   "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel "
> +                   "spi %d reqid 2 mode tunnel replay-window 42 "
>                     "auth-trunc 'hmac(sha1)' %s 96  enc 'cbc(aes)' %s",
>             IP4_ADDR1_VETH1, IP4_ADDR_VETH0, XFRM_SPI_OUT_TO_IN, XFRM_AUTH, XFRM_ENC);
>         SYS(fail,
> @@ -628,8 +628,10 @@ static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>  {
>         DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, tc_hook,
>                             .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_attach_opts, opts);
>         struct test_tunnel_kern *skel = NULL;
>         struct nstoken *nstoken;
> +       int xdp_prog_fd;
>         int tc_prog_fd;
>         int ifindex;
>         int err;
> @@ -654,6 +656,14 @@ static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>         if (attach_tc_prog(&tc_hook, tc_prog_fd, -1))
>                 goto done;
>
> +       /* attach xdp prog to tunnel dev */
> +       xdp_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xfrm_get_state_xdp);
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(xdp_prog_fd, 0, "bpf_program__fd"))
> +               goto done;
> +       err = bpf_xdp_attach(ifindex, xdp_prog_fd, XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE, &opts);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_xdp_attach"))
> +               goto done;
> +
>         /* ping from at_ns0 namespace test */
>         nstoken = open_netns("at_ns0");
>         err = test_ping(AF_INET, IP4_ADDR_TUNL_DEV1);
> @@ -667,6 +677,8 @@ static void test_xfrm_tunnel(void)
>                 goto done;
>         if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_remote_ip, 0xac100164, "remote_ip"))
>                 goto done;
> +       if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xfrm_replay_window, 42, "replay_window"))
> +               goto done;
>
>  done:
>         delete_xfrm_tunnel();
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> index 3a59eb9c34de..c0dd38616562 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tunnel_kern.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ int bpf_skb_set_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
>                           struct bpf_fou_encap *encap, int type) __ksym;
>  int bpf_skb_get_fou_encap(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
>                           struct bpf_fou_encap *encap) __ksym;
> +struct xfrm_state *
> +bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state(struct xdp_md *ctx, struct bpf_xfrm_state_opts *opts,
> +                      u32 opts__sz) __ksym;
> +void bpf_xdp_xfrm_state_release(struct xfrm_state *x) __ksym;
>
>  struct {
>         __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
> @@ -950,4 +954,51 @@ int xfrm_get_state(struct __sk_buff *skb)
>         return TC_ACT_OK;
>  }
>
> +volatile int xfrm_replay_window = 0;
> +
> +SEC("xdp")
> +int xfrm_get_state_xdp(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_xfrm_state_opts opts = {};
> +       struct xfrm_state *x = NULL;
> +       struct ip_esp_hdr *esph;
> +       struct bpf_dynptr ptr;
> +       u8 esph_buf[8] = {};
> +       u8 iph_buf[20] = {};
> +       struct iphdr *iph;
> +       u32 off;
> +
> +       if (bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(xdp, 0, &ptr))
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       off = sizeof(struct ethhdr);
> +       iph = bpf_dynptr_slice(&ptr, off, iph_buf, sizeof(iph_buf));
> +       if (!iph || iph->protocol != IPPROTO_ESP)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       off += sizeof(struct iphdr);
> +       esph = bpf_dynptr_slice(&ptr, off, esph_buf, sizeof(esph_buf));
> +       if (!esph)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       opts.netns_id = BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS;
> +       opts.daddr.a4 = iph->daddr;
> +       opts.spi = esph->spi;
> +       opts.proto = IPPROTO_ESP;
> +       opts.family = AF_INET;
> +
> +       x = bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state(xdp, &opts, sizeof(opts));
> +       if (!x || opts.error)

nit: how can opts.error be non zero if x == NULL?


Eyal.


> +               goto out;
> +
> +       if (!x->replay_esn)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       xfrm_replay_window = x->replay_esn->replay_window;
> +out:
> +       if (x)
> +               bpf_xdp_xfrm_state_release(x);
> +       return XDP_PASS;
> +}
> +
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.42.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ