[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d30d5a41d3ac990573016308aaeacb40a9dc79f.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:57:54 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@...zon.com>, edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, blakgeof@...zon.com, alisaidi@...zon.com,
benh@...zon.com, dipietro.salvatore@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: disable tcp_autocorking for socket when
TCP_NODELAY flag is set
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 10:20 -0800, Salvatore Dipietro wrote:
> Based on the tcp man page, if TCP_NODELAY is set, it disables Nagle's algorithm
> and packets are sent as soon as possible. However in the `tcp_push` function
> where autocorking is evaluated the `nonagle` value set by TCP_NODELAY is not
> considered which can trigger unexpected corking of packets and induce delays.
>
> For example, if two packets are generated as part of a server's reply, if the
> first one is not transmitted on the wire quickly enough, the second packet can
> trigger the autocorking in `tcp_push` and be delayed instead of sent as soon as
> possible. It will either wait for additional packets to be coalesced or an ACK
> from the client before transmitting the corked packet. This can interact badly
> if the receiver has tcp delayed acks enabled, introducing 40ms extra delay in
> completion times. It is not always possible to control who has delayed acks
> set, but it is possible to adjust when and how autocorking is triggered.
> Patch prevents autocorking if the TCP_NODELAY flag is set on the socket.
>
> Patch has been tested using an AWS c7g.2xlarge instance with Ubuntu 22.04 and
> Apache Tomcat 9.0.83 running the basic servlet below:
>
> import java.io.IOException;
> import java.io.OutputStreamWriter;
> import java.io.PrintWriter;
> import javax.servlet.ServletException;
> import javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet;
> import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
> import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;
>
> public class HelloWorldServlet extends HttpServlet {
> @Override
> protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
> throws ServletException, IOException {
> response.setContentType("text/html;charset=utf-8");
> OutputStreamWriter osw = new OutputStreamWriter(response.getOutputStream(),"UTF-8");
> String s = "a".repeat(3096);
> osw.write(s,0,s.length());
> osw.flush();
> }
> }
>
> Load was applied using wrk2 (https://github.com/kinvolk/wrk2) from an AWS
> c6i.8xlarge instance. With the current auto-corking behavior and TCP_NODELAY
> set an additional 40ms latency from P99.99+ values are observed. With the
> patch applied we see no occurrences of 40ms latencies. The patch has also been
> tested with iperf and uperf benchmarks and no regression was observed.
>
> # No patch with tcp_autocorking=1 and TCP_NODELAY set on all sockets
> ./wrk -t32 -c128 -d40s --latency -R10000 http://172.31.49.177:8080/hello/hello'
> ...
> 50.000% 0.91ms
> 75.000% 1.12ms
> 90.000% 1.46ms
> 99.000% 1.73ms
> 99.900% 1.96ms
> 99.990% 43.62ms <<< 40+ ms extra latency
> 99.999% 48.32ms
> 100.000% 49.34ms
>
> # With patch
> ./wrk -t32 -c128 -d40s --latency -R10000 http://172.31.49.177:8080/hello/hello'
> ...
> 50.000% 0.89ms
> 75.000% 1.13ms
> 90.000% 1.44ms
> 99.000% 1.67ms
> 99.900% 1.78ms
> 99.990% 2.27ms <<< no 40+ ms extra latency
> 99.999% 3.71ms
> 100.000% 4.57ms
>
> Signed-off-by: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@...zon.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index d3456cf840de..87751a2a6fff 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ void tcp_push(struct sock *sk, int flags, int mss_now,
>
> tcp_mark_urg(tp, flags);
>
> - if (tcp_should_autocork(sk, skb, size_goal)) {
> + if (!nonagle && tcp_should_autocork(sk, skb, size_goal)) {
It looks like the above disables autocorking even after the userspace
sets TCP_CORK. Am I reading it correctly? Is that expected?
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists