netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] bpf: xfrm: Add selftest for bpf_xdp_get_xfrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:44:42 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, 
	antony.antony@...unet.com, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, 
	Eddy Z <eddyz87@...il.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, 
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, 
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...ux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] bpf: xfrm: Add selftest for bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state()

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:17 AM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
>
> If you don't mind (and there no more comments), I would prefer to send a
> follow up fixing the nits in this revision. So that I stop blasting the
> list (as well as people who may not be as concerned with these details).

Resending patches is little effort while follow up patches
double the commits, more code churn, increase in code reviews, etc.
Always address feedback by resending.