netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v6 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package MMD read/write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6579d3df.050a0220.41f9b.a309@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:55:08 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>,
	Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package
 MMD read/write

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 03:47:19PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:57:30AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Some PHY in PHY package may require to read/write MMD regs to correctly
> > configure the PHY package.
> > 
> > Add support for these additional required function in both lock and no
> > lock variant.
> > 
> > It's assumed that the entire PHY package is either C22 or C45. We use
> > C22 or C45 way of writing/reading to mmd regs based on the passed phydev
> > whether it's C22 or C45.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> 
> I don't recall what has been said in previous postings of this, but
> introducing new helpers without an example user is normally frowned
> upon. The lack of cover message for this three patch series also
> doesn't help (the cover message could explain why there's no users
> being proposed with this addition of helpers.)
>

These are prereq for the qca803x PHY driver and the PHY package series.

I can move this single patch in those series, but it was suggested to
move these simple change to a separate patch to lower the patch number
since they were orthogonal to the PHY package series proposal.

-- 
	Ansuel