[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZXoS3faDCUuZaLuN@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 20:23:57 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] net: ethtool: add define for link speed
mode number
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:15:27PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:10:42PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > NAK.
> >
> > You *clearly* didn't look before you leaped.
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 07:15:53PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > +enum ethtool_link_speeds {
> > > + SPEED_10 = 0,
> > > + SPEED_100,
> > > + SPEED_1000,
> > ...
> >
> > and from the context immediately below, included in your patch:
> > > #define SPEED_10 10
> > ^^^^^^^^
> > > #define SPEED_100 100
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> > > #define SPEED_1000 1000
> > ^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > Your enumerated values will be overridden by the preprocessor
> > definitions.
> >
> > Moreover, SPEED_xxx is an already taken namespace and part of the UAPI,
> > and thus can _not_ be changed. Convention is that SPEED_x will be
> > defined as the numeric speed.
> >
>
> Well yes that is the idea of having the enum to count them and then redefining
> them to the correct value. (wasn't trying to introduce new define for
> the speed and trying to assign incremental values)
>
> Any idea how to handle this without the enum - redefine thing?
>
> Was trying to find a more automated way than defining the raw number of
> the current modes. (but maybe this is not that bad? since on adding more
> modes, other values has to be changed so it would be just another value
> to document in the comment)
I think my comment on patch 2 gives some ideas! :D
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists