netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: reset: mediatek: add MT7988 ethwarp reset IDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ca36158-c57d-4130-94f5-c3650594498c@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:00:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Sabrina Dubroca
 <sd@...asysnail.net>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
 "Garmin.Chang" <Garmin.Chang@...iatek.com>, Sam Shih
 <sam.shih@...iatek.com>, Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: reset: mediatek: add MT7988 ethwarp
 reset IDs

On 12/12/2023 04:18, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Add reset ID for ethwarp subsystem allowing to reset the built-in
> Ethernet switch of the MediaTek MT7988 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> ---

No need for one patch per one header. Headers are parts of new binding
patch. If you decide to keep headers separate for easier review, then
they could be in one header-only-patch.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof