netdev - RE: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig - failed - net/wireless/shipped-certs.c:92:1: error: expected '}' before numeric constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <TYCPR01MB112699830AA2FC0A8348D9818868CA@TYCPR01MB11269.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:33:38 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>, "naresh.kamboju@...aro.org"
	<naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "Berg, Benjamin"
	<benjamin.berg@...el.com>, "dan.carpenter@...aro.org"
	<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>, "Korenblit,
 Miriam Rachel" <miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com>,
	"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig - failed -
 net/wireless/shipped-certs.c:92:1: error: expected '}' before numeric
 constant

Hi Johannes,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berg, Johannes <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 9:32 AM
> Subject: RE: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig - failed -
> net/wireless/shipped-certs.c:92:1: error: expected '}' before numeric
> constant
> 
> >
> > FYI, This issue is seen on today next as well, the generated code[2]
> > is missing a comma leading to Build failure. Is it a requirement to
> > use latest toolchain for linux-next?
> 
> Well, no surprise since I was out yesterday😉
> 
> The issue isn't the toolchain or anything - it's related to the ordering
> in which the two files are returned when make checks for them... I've
> pushed a fix.

Cool. Thanks for the pushfix.

Cheers,
Biju