netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] bpf: xfrm: Add selftest for bpf_xdp_get_xfrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQL_=Hot71RV9dQ7FN6bm8TY3aMiouhAnQHUg3tmKtWStQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:53:28 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>, Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, 
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, antony.antony@...unet.com, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, Eddy Z <eddyz87@...il.com>, 
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...ux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] bpf: xfrm: Add selftest for bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state()

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:24 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
>
> Looks like only x86 supports exceptions (looking at
> bpf_jit_supports_exceptions()).
>
> This causes selftests in this patchset to fail on !x86, which is
> unfortunate. We probably want to be running these tests on all the major
> archs, so I will drop the assertion patches from this patchset.
>
> But since they're generally useful and I've already written the
> selftests for it, I could put them up in another patchset? Or maybe not
> cuz you're gonna fix it later anyways. WDYT?

Yeah. don't use bpf_assert in generic tests yet.
Only tests that test bpf_assert should use it.

Pls send the ones you wrote separately, so they stay in email archives
and we can pick them up later.