[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231213181303.34833b32@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:13:03 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Florian Fainelli
<florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, David Epping
<david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>, Harini Katakam
<harini.katakam@....com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v6 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package
MMD read/write
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:26:43 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> I tend to use cover letters only for big series, sorry for not being
> very clear about this.
FWIW in netdev the rule of thumb is "if there's more than 2 patches,
there's probably extra context". Even the 2 patch exception for cover
letters is mostly for when people post code + test, as two separate
patches. Cover letter stating that you have a series for xyz
pending, which will need this, seems like a straightforward ask..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists